Animating Archives (W)rap Sheet
December 7, 2009
This was one of the best conferences I ever attended. The take home message for future conference organizers is hard to replicate: 1) carefully chosen speakers 2) given ample time (2 speakers in 1 and 1/2 hour sessions) and 3) beautifully choreographed two-day flow, where distinct areas of approach, method, discipline and theory, hit against each other to build to a crescendo. Not one dud. Here’s the rap sheet of one-liners:
Diana Taylor: Archives, repertoires, and the digital are each made from practices, things, and places (riven with power) in distinct configurations.
James Chandler: Animating archives through re-presenting holdings in translated forms itself has a history as long as modernism’s.
Sharon Daniel: Poetics and aesthetics can be written into the ethics of the archive.
Matthew Fuller: The relational archive links through a messy rhetoric of power that includes findable “flubs” like deletions and leaks.
Amelie Hastie: The body’s archive of memory, desire, longing and loss fuels a search for objects that might objectify their trace.
Josh Kun: Digital music generates mobile archives of local/transnational style and taste.
Lawrence Liang: Ownership is not only a matter of capital but also of proximity and love. To own can be to owe, a matter of ethics.
Janine Marchessault: A life on-line might map the lost as it pools into a shared computer dream of all seeing.
Trevor Paglen: The military-industrial complex litters our skies with evil digital eyes, the better to see you with. So,
Lisa Parks: we must look up, not across, in a shot-reverse of accountability.
Abby Smith Rumsey: The evidence of things remains for our loving re-use. Digital things will be lost without stewardship.
Ramesh Srinivasan: Embrace the incommensurability when the local(e) gets to gather, save and organize the complex, adaptive, fluid stuff they love.
James Tobias: We engage in a history-free media-logic to the peril of the complex lineages of local practices.