#27: new image holding environments needed

March 2, 2017

In my review in the Brooklyn Rail of the ICP show Perpetual Revolution: The Image and Social Change, I write:

As access has exponentially grown to visualization and distribution technologies, what changes is not the urgency to capture the world with evidentiary, critical or even forbidden images. Rather, today’s social justice images connect to, but differ from, earlier iterations from these struggles in two key ways: they are known primarily through their scale and speed—a veritable cascade of undifferentiated images—and secondly, their changed viewing platforms that by design rip images from their initial instantiation, maker, or even cause. In our new world of making and receiving images defined by their volume and loss of context, the show’s diverse curators use the ICP to build context: an image holding environment where connection and cohesion accrue through curation albeit with some definitive difference.

Sheila Pree Bright, #1960Now: Art + Intersection, 2015. Video. © Sheila Pree Bright. Courtesy International Center of Photography.

Sheila Pree Bright, #1960Now: Art + Intersection, 2015. Video. © Sheila Pree Bright. Courtesy International Center of Photography.

I continue: “In a time where the promise of self-expression has been fundamentally realized only to be as quickly commodified, where our righteous images are easily ripped from their origins so that one person’s proof can become someone else’s opposing “truth,” curatorial projects supported by cultural institutions that ground our images and our acts of reception in carefully constructed contexts might be some of the best possible “good” holding environments, places that might enable us to remake ourselves as the informed, receptive, interactive, embodied citizens most worthy of making use of the history and current conditions of the social justice images in our midst.”

I made a similar claim about New Documents, a powerful and important show that I saw at the Bronx Documentary Center (currently showing Whose Streets Our Streets). As I’ve been arguing for 26 posts, fake news depends upon and reflects the core logic of the internet: its definitive context-loss, volume, corporate and government ownership and framing, and delight in the decay of clarity of the fake/true divide. Places with other logics can and must hold, move, and ground our images if they are to have the “truth” value that is most needed for an informed democracy.

This room, in its place, the Bronx, NYC, with more surrounding wall text, and the volunteer who believes in the Bronx, and photography, and the power of its people, is one such radical place (a good holding environment) for the watching, thinking about, and making use of witness images. This place is a context from which these images accrue deeper meaning and greater value, written as they are, not into a callous, corporate internet, or a ready-steady flow of social media, but rather, a well-thought-out history, analysis, community and purpose, a place where small screen evidence by ordinary people can meet more ordinary people who care enough to get there, learn more, and engage.

Bronx Documentary Center

Bronx Documentary Center

See More:

Advertisements

4 Responses to “#27: new image holding environments needed”


  1. […] Chino) for Desert X, Jennifer Bolande presents several responses to some of the #100hardtruths presented in my series: particularly in relation to seeing the corporate players who track us while attending […]


  2. […] these and all images. We need to think through what to do with what we see. We need time and context and care) […]


  3. […] imagine that art exhibitions can hold films and photos and tweets and videos in ways that help to provide clarity: #27: New image holding environments needed […]


  4. […] Producing contexts for our interactions, for our participation and sharing, has always been but becomes now even more so: everything. In Situation 8, by my friends John Lucas and Claudia Rankine (one of a larger series, Situations), we see one attempt to produce ethical context for seeing: a poetic, historic, lyric, audio-rich analysis that situates unspeakable images between known and unknown viewers who will have to “put their trust” in each other. […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: